Author
will read the ¶(s) aloud. “Subject” will
listen for accuracy and continuity and, when needed, make suggestions, either
orally or directly on the paper.
Accuracy:
As you, the “subject,” listen to
the ¶, try to pick up on which pieces of information are absolutely essential,
which may need elaboration, which might be eliminated, and so on. Make sure this reflects you
honestly.
Second Reading (Verbal):
Continuity:
·Do
the details logically flow?
If they do not, what other arrangement/order would get the job done
better?
·What
final impression of the writer does the end of the ¶ make? At the end, if the writing just seems to fade
away, suggest a more solid conclusion.
Details, details:
·Provide
a title which ties in with the information. If no title yet exists, make a suggestion; it
should not
merely be the subject’s name!
·Incorporate
a direct quotation (word, phrase, sentence—anything). You do not need to limit yourself to just
one.
Third Reading (Silent):
Creativity and word choice:
·Does
the writing capture your attention,
even with the opening sentence?
·
·Circle
the first word of each sentence: see any patterns? If there are too many “He’s” or “She’s,” or
the subject’s name begins every other sentence, suggest ways to work around
this ineffective repetition.
·
·Box
each verb: see any patterns? Suggest strong, specific verbs to replace
generic ones; make sure the verbs are in the same tense
throughout.
Fourth Reading (Silent):
What sentences could use more substance?
(are there really short sentences that could be combined with parallel
structure?)
What sentences are overpacked and
go on too long?
Is there any passive
voice in
the piece? How can you flip it?
Any other examples of redundancy? One
word being repeated too often?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.